Arbitration in Spain: An Overview
Introduction
Arbitration has emerged as a widely favoured approach to dispute resolution in Spain, providing a private, efficient, and adaptable alternative to conventional court proceedings. Spanish arbitration operates under a comprehensive legal framework that adheres to international standards, positioning the country as an appealing venue for both domestic and cross-border matters. This article offers an overview of arbitration in Spain, outlining the governing legislation, key characteristics, and the procedures for enforcement and appeals.
Legal Framework
The primary statute governing arbitration in Spain is the Spanish Arbitration Act ("SAA"), which is heavily influenced by the UNCITRAL Model Law. The SAA provides a comprehensive legal framework that ensures fairness and efficiency in arbitration proceedings. In addition to the SAA, other relevant statutes include the Law on International Legal Cooperation in Civil and Commercial Matters, the Spanish Civil Procedural Act ("CPA"), and the Organic Law of the Judiciary.
Spain is considered a civil law jurisdiction, and the SAA differentiates between domestic and international arbitration. Article 3 of the SAA explicitly outlines this distinction, ensuring that the legal framework is tailored to the specific needs of both domestic and international parties.
Key Features of Arbitration in Spain
In Spain, parties can choose from a variety of arbitral institutions and rules. At the local level, the most common institutions are the Court of Arbitration of Madrid ("CAM"), the Civil and Commercial Court of Arbitration ("CIMA"), and the Spanish Court of Arbitration ("CEA"). For international arbitration, the International Chamber of Commerce ("ICC") and the International Centre of Arbitration of Madrid ("CIAM") are frequently chosen.
The SAA includes both mandatory and non-mandatory provisions. Mandatory provisions, which parties cannot contract out of, include the requirement for an arbitration agreement to be in writing, the impartiality and independence of arbitrators, the right to a fair hearing, and equal treatment of the parties. Non-mandatory provisions, which parties can modify or exclude by agreement, include the procedure for appointing arbitrators, the rules governing the conduct of the arbitration proceedings, and the place and language of arbitration.
In civil arbitration in Spain, the burden of proof primarily lies with the claimant, who must demonstrate the facts supporting their claim. However, the burden can shift if the respondent raises a counterclaim or an affirmative defence. The approach to disclosure in Spain is more limited compared to Common Law jurisdictions, with a focus on specific documents or evidence directly relevant to the case.
In Spain, the concept of "privilege" is covered by professional secrecy. Lawyers cannot disclose any confidential information or documents obtained during their professional activity, including communications and other documents exchanged with clients. Breaches of so-called professional secrecy can lead to criminal liability and sanctions from the Bar Association.
Witness evidence is an important aspect of arbitration proceedings in Spain, but it is generally given less weight compared to documentary evidence. Witnesses typically provide oral testimony during the hearing, and written witness statements may be admitted depending on the procedural rules. Expert evidence is also crucial, with experts appointed either by the arbitral tribunal or by the parties. Expert reports must be submitted in writing and are presented during the arbitration hearing.
Enforcement and Appeals
Spain is a signatory to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention), which facilitates the enforcement of arbitral awards across borders. The process for enforcing an arbitral award in Spain involves requesting recognition through a written submission to the High Court of Justice of the Autonomous Community where enforcement is sought, followed by the exequatur procedure.
The SAA provides specific grounds for the annulment of arbitral awards, including the non-existence or invalidity of the arbitration agreement, lack of proper notification, decisions on matters not submitted to arbitration, and awards contrary to public order. While the right to appeal is generally reserved for ordinary jurisdiction, some arbitration institutions allow parties to include an appeal procedure in their arbitration agreement.
Conclusion
Arbitration in Spain is a dependable and streamlined avenue for dispute resolution, underpinned by a solid legal structure and a range of esteemed arbitral bodies. The Spanish Arbitration Act, shaped by the UNCITRAL Model Law, guarantees that proceedings are handled with fairness and efficiency. With well-defined enforcement mechanisms and narrowly defined grounds for contesting awards, Spain stands out as a favourable venue for both domestic and cross-border arbitration.
