A Collection is a selection of features, articles, comments and opinions on any given theme or topic. It allows you to stay up‑to‑date with what interests you most.
Login here to access your saved articles and followed authors.
We have sent you an email so you can reset your password.
Sorry, we had a problem.
Tags related to this article
Published 27 junio 2022
Liquidated damages (“LDs”) clauses are a common contractual feature in high value and/or complex commercial health projects. They are a useful tool for both customers and suppliers. From a customer’s perspective, they incentivise suppliers to perform in accordance with contractual expectations. For suppliers, they can provide commercial comfort that additional costs can be recovered if a customer fails to perform obligations which impact on the supplier’s performance and/or costs.
They are often used as a remedy for critical aspects of project implementation and/or transition periods and including a LDs clause in a contract shines a light on both parties’ obligations, which can be particularly helpful when there are inter-dependent obligations. Such focus can ensure contractual ambiguities or misunderstandings are addressed from the outset and the contract can be clearly drafted to reflect each party’s obligations. This, in turn, helps to reduce operational risk. It’s important that a LD clause is carefully drafted so as to avoid any risk of a court deeming the clause to be unenforceable.
This alert considers: (1) the advantages of liquidated damages clauses; and (2) key drafting issues to avoid any risk of the provision(s) being deemed to be unenforceable.
Advantages of a liquidated damages clause
Where a party breaches a contract, the general position is that the non-defaulting party will be able to pursue a claim for damages. A breach of contract claim will need to be enforced via the courts which takes time and expense (even if they are settled out of court). However, a LDs clause provides for a pre-agreed sum of money to be payable in the event of a specified breach of contract. This circumvents the need to pursue damages claims via the courts, thus saving time and money.
LDs clauses are often drafted for the benefit of the customer, as it is the customer requiring the performance of services and/or the provision of goods in specified timeframes. However, in complex contracts where, for example, delivery and/or implementation/mobilisation relies heavily on the interfacing of customer and supplier responsibilities, LDs clauses can also be included to protect the supplier.
Advantages of including a LDs clause:
It should of course be noted that if a LDs clause is enforceable, the breaching party is liable for the financial remedy that it has agreed to notwithstanding the loss suffered by the non-breaching party - this is why it is so important to ensure that the commercial quantification of loss is very carefully considered. Including in a contract LDs that are either too high or too low can be problematic for both sides, as explored below.
Setting the amount of the LDs is a commercial decision. However, the clause also needs legal input to ensure any amounts are based on a realistic assessment of the potential loss that could be suffered, along with the protection of the legitimate interests of the non-breaching party. It’s important to note:
The courts have drawn a distinction between a valid LDs clause and those held to be unenforceable penalties in an abundance of case law. Historically, the clause would be enforceable if it represented a genuine pre-estimate of loss suffered by the non-breaching party. However, the Supreme Court decision in Cavendish Square Holding BV v El Makdessi and ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis  UKSC 67 (considered together), rewrote the law on penalty clauses. A clause may be an unenforceable penalty if:
It is worth noting that although the courts have shifted away from the “traditional approach” relating to whether the clause is a genuine pre-estimate of loss, it has not been overruled and may still be relevant / be followed when considering the validity of straightforward LDs clauses.
In summary, LDs clauses need to be drafted carefully. An unenforceable clause may result in a lengthy and expensive damages claim that could, otherwise, have been avoided. Interfacing commercial considerations and legal advice is key to managing this risk for all parties and comes with the advantage of focusing minds on operational risks and contractual clarity to help reduce the risk of such clauses crystallising in the first place.
If you have any questions in relation to the points covered in this update, please contact Hamza Drabu, Carol Sumner or Louise Kane.
London - Walbrook
+44 (0)20 7894 6411
+44 (0)7901 851286
+44(0)20 7894 6556
Alison McAdams, Hamza Drabu, Olya Melnitchouk
Gill Weatherill, Corinne Slingo, Charlotte Radcliffe, Anna Hart
Gill Weatherill, Tracey Longfield, Louise Wiltshire, Gemma Brannigan
Ciaran Claffey, Heather Durston-Hillyer
Gemma Brannigan, Sara Lyle, Nnena Ene
Alison McAdams, Hamza Drabu, Charlotte Radcliffe
Tim Ryan, David Valu
Nikki Green, Simon Perkins
Alison Martin, Carol Sumner, John Dunlop
Stuart Wallace, Mark Ashley, Hannah Volpe
Katherine Calder, Ed Williams, Grace Tebbutt
Mark Ashley, Ciaran Claffey
Katherine Calder, Joanne Dumphy, Ryan Jenkins
Paul McGough, Matthew Nichols, Helen Dandridge