A Collection is a selection of features, articles, comments and opinions on any given theme or topic. It allows you to stay up‑to‑date with what interests you most.
Login here to access your saved articles and followed authors.
We have sent you an email so you can reset your password.
Sorry, we had a problem.
Tags related to this article
Download PDF Print page
Published 26 febrero 2020
Any applicable leasehold interest has to arise from a lease originally granted for more than a 40 year term and of which more than 25 years have already passed.
A recent case relied on this approach to modify (not replace) the tenant’s permitted use from office and ancillary residential to use as a private members club. This was on the basis that this use was reasonable, that the current permitted use was obsolete, and that the proposed use caused no injury to the Landlord.
The fact that the tenant had planning consent and a premises licence supported its position that the alternative use was reasonable. Further the rent achievable under the new use would be greater and, therefore, the reversionary interest would also increase in value.
Although the obsolete argument was not considered acceptable, the Tribunal did find the reasonable alternative use and no injury arguments to be successful and widened the restrictive covenant in the lease to allow for use as a private members club.
This case makes it clear that landlords don’t always have the last word …!
Newcastle
+44 (0)191 404 4019
By Mereaira Jones
By Gwyneth Barton, Guy Knight
By Gemma Leonard
By Rosa-Maria Kane
By Mary Waters
By Elizabeth Coton
By Stephanie Bagshaw, Clare Hartley
By Andrew Hollier
By Stephanie Bagshaw
By Joanna Grech
By Stephanie Bagshaw, Fiona Gill
By Daniel Kendall
By Andrew Morgan, Joe Whimpenny
By Paul Best
By Andrew Morgan, Mereaira Jones
By Chloe Postlethwaite
By Daniel Kendall, Sarah Pickering
By Stephanie Bagshaw, Matthew Stokes
By Martha Grekos, Isaac Jong