A Collection is a selection of features, articles, comments and opinions on any given theme or topic. It allows you to stay up‑to‑date with what interests you most.
Login here to access your saved articles and followed authors.
We have sent you an email so you can reset your password.
Sorry, we had a problem.
Tags related to this article
Published 3 marzo 2015
Commuted sum payments under highway agreements are lawful so says the Court of Appeal.
Developers can be liable for the on-going and future highway maintenance work even after a road has been adopted and is "maintainable at the public expense" following a recent Court of Appeal decision. The Court decided in Redrow Homes v Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council that Redrow was obliged to pay a commuted sum figure of £39,000 towards the future maintenance of street lighting after the adoption of an estate road.
Going forward, developers should begin negotiating highway agreements in the development process as soon as a detailed scheme is in place and pay close attention to what the relevant local authority policy is on highway maintenance.
A more risk-averse developer might consider negotiating with the selling landowner to make a contract conditional on a "satisfactory" highways agreement being entered into, or to provide for a price adjustment post highways agreement being entered into to ensure the development remains commercially viable on the basis of any charges or maintenance obligations that may be imposed.
London - Walbrook
+44 (0)20 7894 6429
Robert Lee, Gemma Leonard, Ben Pariser
Christopher Stanwell, Ben Sasson
Robert Lee, James Harrison, Ben Pariser, Gemma Leonard
Andrew Morgan, Christopher Stanwell