A Collection is a selection of features, articles, comments and opinions on any given theme or topic. It allows you to stay up‑to‑date with what interests you most.
Login here to access your saved articles and followed authors.
We have sent you an email so you can reset your password.
Sorry, we had a problem.
Tags related to this article
Download PDF Print page
Published 26 enero 2015
You may recall our alert from October last year, about R (Moseley) v Haringey LBC [2014] UKSC 56. In Moseley, the Supreme Court considered the duties on a local authority when consulting on proposed service cuts. Haringey was found wanting, primarily on the basis that its consultation materials failed to recognise the existence of alternatives to its proposed method of responding to cuts by central government in its own budget: by cutting council tax relief by a commensurate amount.
Download
London - Walbrook
+44 (0)20 7894 6020
By Darryn Hale, Sophie Devlin
By Dr Alexandra von Westernhagen, David Harrison
By Charlotte Burnett, Hamza Drabu, Sarah Foster
By Mary Mundy
By Tim Dennis
By Mary Mundy, Victoria Fletcher
By Darryn Hale, Hamza Drabu, Christian Carr
By Sally Roff, Neil Scott
By David Knapp, David Williams
By Alistair Robertson, Stephen Hocking
By Anne Crofts
By Alistair Robertson, Sophie Devlin
By Alistair Robertson
By Jonathan Brogden, Pippa Ellis
By Tom Baker, David Williams
By Thomas Watkinson
By Philip Murrin
