A Collection is a selection of features, articles, comments and opinions on any given theme or topic. It allows you to stay up‑to‑date with what interests you most.
Login here to access your saved articles and followed authors.
We have sent you an email so you can reset your password.
Sorry, we had a problem.
Tags related to this article
Download PDF Print page
Published 27 mayo 2014
The Court of Appeal recently considered the relationship between parent and subsidiary companies in asbestos claims in the case of Thompson v The Renwick Group plc, 13 May 2014.
The Claimant handled raw asbestos when employed by Arthur Wood & Co (Transport) Ltd and David Hall & Sons Ltd. Both companies were subsidiaries of The Renwick Group and its predecessors for two of the nine years of the Claimant's exposure. Neither company had EL insurance in place and, by the time it was presented, neither held sufficient assets to meet the claim.
Click here to read more.
Bristol
+44 (0) 117 918 2758
Leeds
+44 (0)113 251 4844
By William Swift
By Cassandra Mitchell, William Swift
By David Williams, David Johnson
By William Swift, Cassandra Mitchell
By Laura Wiseman, Mark Bailey, Georgia Court
By John Goodman
By Stephanie Welsher
By Sally Roff
By Chris Baranowski
By Thomas Jordan, Jonathan Mitchell
By Adam Burrell
By David Williams
By Ash Sharma
By Andrew Parker, David Williams, Peter Allchorne
By David Williams, Peter Allchorne, William Swift
By Sean McGahan, Catriona McCorry