A Collection is a selection of features, articles, comments and opinions on any given theme or topic. It allows you to stay up‑to‑date with what interests you most.
Login here to access your saved articles and followed authors.
We have sent you an email so you can reset your password.
Sorry, we had a problem.
Tags related to this article
Download PDF Print page
Published 12 April 2022
The Official Injury Claim (OIC) service has published its third release of data covering the period from 1 December 2021 to 31 March 2022. This reveals a sharp increase in claims being successfully resolved within the process and that unrepresented claimants are, on average, recovering at least as much in damages as claimants who have legal representation.
Our commentary on the previous data release contained some myth-busting and we can now also dispel the concern that claimants are exposed to risk in using the system without representation. The statistics show there is clear parity between the compensation paid to both represented and unrepresented claimants and it is, in fact, the unrepresented claimants who nudge slightly ahead in terms of average awards.
The average number of new claims rose by around 1,000 per month. This is despite the reporting period containing the month of December, which is traditionally lower for new claims submitted.
In the previous reporting period there were 3,468 settlements recorded. The latest report period shows 13,843 settlements, a steep increase of almost 400%. This number rises further when adding ‘open settlements’ which account for matters resolved in the process but not marked as complete by a user. OIC has confirmed its intention to introduce an auto-closure feature to remove this issue and improve future reporting.
The frequency of exceptional uplift being claimed held relatively stable as against the previous period, as did claims featuring mixed injuries (both tariff and non-tariff) which remain at around 2/3 of claims submitted.
For the first time, we can now see more detailed information regarding tariff banding applied to settlements. 14% of whiplash injuries resolved within 3 months, 51% within 6 months and 28% within 9 months. However, we must apply caution when considering emerging trends. The data is for cases that have been settled so far and therefore naturally more biased towards lower prognosis periods on account of the date the system went live.
The number of liability admissions rose in the period from 82% to 84% and cases leaving the portal to go to court remain low, at just 250 for the reporting period. This is a clear sign that compensators are benefitting from the additional period afforded by the protocol for liability investigations. Admissions are being made where necessary, with claims being resolved thereafter, and the low volume of matters exiting the process to proceed to court suggests that disputes on liability are well-reasoned and provided with supporting evidence.
Although there is no commentary on NVC, we continue to see emerging behaviours in this area from some claimant representatives. These behaviours include:
We continue to monitor these behaviours and have developed numerous strategies to combat them, which can be accessed via our whiplash reforms microsite. If you require access or strategic assistance please get in touch to explore this further.
Newport
+44 (0) 163 365 7891
Manchester
+44 (0)161 934 3064
Birmingham
+44(0)121 698 5361
By Andrew Parker, Joanna Folan
By Phil Murrin, Chris Lewis
By Duncan Strachan, Lucy Dennison
By Katie Anderson
By Rebecca Austin
By Rebecca Austin, Fiona Gill
By Andrew Parker, Peter Allchorne, Caroline Hall, Michael McCabe
By Malory Zafra Sierra
By Stefan Desbordes, Chris Baranowski
By Richard Wetherell
By Gustavo Blanco
By Campbell Dye, Macarena Cambara
By Toby Vallance, Annabel Walker
By Louise Bloomfield
By Charlotte Halford
By Javier Moya