A Collection is a selection of features, articles, comments and opinions on any given theme or topic. It allows you to stay up‑to‑date with what interests you most.
Login here to access your saved articles and followed authors.
We have sent you an email so you can reset your password.
Sorry, we had a problem.
Tags related to this article
Download PDF Print page
Published 25 August 2021
Sometimes developments require you to team up with another developer (or even more than one developer). If structured correctly, this can be quite tax efficient.
There are lots of taxes to be alert to, depending on how you go about your joint venture. VAT or corporation tax and the property’s base costs for example. This article is focussed on SDLT at the point of introduction of the partner to a joint venture. If the land has already been acquired by one developer, correct structuring can ensure no SDLT is payable when another partner joins. The removal of this cost can help maximise the return for both developers.
A key requirement to ensuring no SDLT when a partner joins is making sure the land owner developer holds the development land through an internal LLP as opposed to in a single company’s name (either at the outset, or prior to entering into arrangements with a partner). You can then swap out an internal partner with an external partner without the incoming partner incurring SDLT. We will explain through two alternative scenarios:
The end result is identical, but the second structure removes almost quarter of a million of SDLT. This is not an aggressive interpretation of the law, HMRC confirm changes in the membership of house builder partnerships do not attract SDLT in their manuals at SDLTM34010. This is not a straight forward area of law however, we strongly recommend you take tax advice as early as possible – there are traps (many avoidable) which can trigger SDLT.
If you would like to discuss this further, please feel free to contact your usual DAC Beachcroft real estate contact.
London - Walbrook
+44 (0)20 7894 6330