Show/Hide Tags

Recent case finds charity’s policy discriminates unlawfully's Tags

Tags related to this article

Recent case finds charity’s policy discriminates unlawfully

Published 16 July 2020

The case of R (Cornerstone (North East) Adoption and Fostering Service Ltd v Ofsted [2020] EWHC 1679 (Admin) was decided last Friday 10 July. In very brief summary, the High Court held it was unlawful for a charitable adoption and fostering agency to accept only heterosexual evangelical Christians as the potential carers of fostered children. The claim arose because Ofsted had concluded that the charity’s recruitment policy violated various provisions of the Equality Act 2010 (EA 2010) and the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998). The charity sought to judicially review Ofsted.

The Court decided – among other things - that:

The charity’s recruitment policy was not unlawful insofar as it requires carer applicants to be evangelical Christians.
But it was unlawfully discriminatory under the EA 2010 and in breach of Articles 8 and 14 of the Convention insofar as it required applicants to refrain from ‘homosexual behaviour’.
Schedule 23 of the EA 2010 provides a general exemption for organisations relating to religion or belief in respect of discrimination on grounds of religion or belief but not in respect of discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation where the organisation performs functions on behalf of public authorities pursuant to contract, as the charity in this case did (see Sch 23 para 2(10)).
The general charitable exemption in section 193 of the EA 2010 for discrimination in the provision of benefits in pursuance of a charitable instrument where this is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim (or for the purpose of preventing or compensating for a disadvantage linked to the protected characteristic) did not apply as on the evidence the charity’s policy was disproportionate to its articulated aims.

Key Contacts

Alistair Robertson

London - Walbrook

+44 (0)20 7894 6020

arobertson@dacbeachcroft.com

Amy Smith

Bristol

+44(0)117 918 2522

axsmith@dacbeachcroft.com

Recent case finds charity’s policy discriminates unlawfully

Key Contacts

Alistair Robertson

Amy Smith

Court of Appeal provides valuable guidance on cauda equine syndrome claims

National Day Surgery Delivery Pack: the highlights

Social Care - 2020 and beyond

Social Care - 2020 and beyond: Regulation and governance

Social Care - 2020 and beyond: Investment and finance

Social Care - 2020 and beyond: New opportunities, New Beginning

Social Care - 2020 and beyond: Conclusions and Recommendations

Prevention of Future Deaths Reports - Impact of Revised Guidance?

Claims+ - supporting your clinical negligence needs

No compensation for loss arising from a claimant’s criminal activity: the final chapter

Recoverability of inquest costs – what constitutes an ‘admission’?

E-mailing MHA forms: Making sense of the changes coming soon

Medical Cannabis and CBD: challenges and opportunities

Medical Cannabis and CBD in the UK

Medical Cannabis and CBD: a view from the professional bodies

Medical Cannabis and CBD: opportunities for investors

Medical Cannabis and CBD: international models

Medical Cannabis and CBD: a summary of the challenges and opportunities in the UK

World Patient Safety Day – Safe Health Workers, Safe Patients

New ‘Who Pays?’ Guidance - What CCGs need to know