A Collection is a selection of features, articles, comments and opinions on any given theme or topic. It allows you to stay up‑to‑date with what interests you most.
Login here to access your saved articles and followed authors.
We have sent you an email so you can reset your password.
Sorry, we had a problem.
Tags related to this article
Published 2 April 2019
To meet those aims the Consultation proposed the following changes to the MTCs:
The proposals were not very well received in the PI market with them being described as “fundamentally flawed” and by Howdens as “nonsensical” and “lunacy”. The Law Society and many other professions in the market were heavily critical of the consultation and of the claims data that the SRA had used to reach their conclusions.
The SRA announced on 11 December 2018 that it has put reform of the professional indemnity market on the back-burner as changes to the compensation fund qualifying criteria needed to take priority. The regulator is unlikely to discuss a response to the PII issue until spring 2020 at the earliest, however, SRA Chief Executive Paul Phillip has stated that there “is no commitment at the moment to do anything” and Richard Collins, SRA Director of policy has indicated that given the concerns raised by many over the quality of the underlying data, he cannot see any reforms being implemented before 2020.
In the meantime however the SRA is pressing on with a new handbook which will incorporate new rules allowing “unregulated” solicitors to have no insurance and for “freelance” solicitors to have “appropriate” insurance. These new provisions will come into effect early summer 2019. Quite what the implications will be for the profession and for consumers - particularly given the focus the SRA places on “client protections” – remains to be seen.
+44 (0)113 251 4775
+44 (0)11 7918 2278