A Collection is a selection of features, articles, comments and opinions on any given theme or topic. It allows you to stay up‑to‑date with what interests you most.
Login here to access your saved articles and followed authors.
We have sent you an email so you can reset your password.
Sorry, we had a problem.
Tags related to this article
Published 1 February 2016
In a recent case (decision number 2015/32) before the Turkish Constitutional Court (the Court) a party claimed that the definition of personal data violated the right to privacy (Art 20) and the principle of legality (Art 38) under the Constitution due to the definition not being clear or limited in its scope. The definition appears at Article 136(1) of the Criminal Code (the Code).
This argument was rejected by the Court who highlighted the difficulties encountered when legislating at a time of such rapid technological development, and as such that the definition in the Code could not list each type of information considered to be personal data.
To view the full text of the Constitutional Court decision, please click here (Turkish).
The definition of personal data according to the Code remains wide and organisations operating in Turkey should ensure any data that could fall within this definition is being dealt with in line with legal requirements.
London - Walbrook
+44 (0)20 7894 6577
Shehana Cameron Perera, Lorraine Ekong, Jade Kowalski, Rhiannon Webster, Ceri Fuller, Khurram Shamsee, Christopher Air, Sophie Devlin
Aleksandar Dimitrov, Neal Pal
Rhiannon Webster, Charlie Christie
Hans Allnutt, Mark Anderson, Gregory Bautista, Anjali Das, Kieran Doyle, Bastian Finkel
Hans Allnutt, Rhiannon Webster
Hans Allnutt, Patrick Hill, Laura Stewart, Lorraine Ekong
Lorraine Ekong, Hans Allnutt
Hans Allnutt, Camilla Elliot
Hans Allnutt, Patrick Hill
Hans Allnutt, Rhiannon Webster, Patrick Hill