A Collection is a selection of features, articles, comments and opinions on any given theme or topic. It allows you to stay up‑to‑date with what interests you most.
Login here to access your saved articles and followed authors.
We have sent you an email so you can reset your password.
Sorry, we had a problem.
Tags related to this article
Published 1 February 2016
As a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Knauer v Ministry of Justice claims brought under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 for loss of income or services dependency will attract higher awards of compensation.
Between 1997 and 2007, Sally Knauer worked as an administrator at Guy’s Marsh Prison, in Dorset. While working at the prison she was exposed to asbestos. In March 2009, Mrs Knauer was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma and she died on 28 August 2009 aged 49. Mrs Knauer is survived by her husband and three children (aged 22, 20 and 16).
Claims were made by Mrs Knauer’s estate and by her dependents in respect of the lost value of the income and services that she would have provided had she not developed mesothelioma. The usual method for calculating such claims is to quantify the annual value of the loss, and apply to this a multiplier which is set with reference to the Ogden tables and reflects the Deceased’s life expectancy.
Prior to the Supreme Court’s decision, the multiplier was calculated from the date of death and not from the date of trial. The multiplier would have deducted from it the number of years passing between death and trial, as well as a small discount for contingencies other than death. The remainder of the multiplier would be used to calculate future losses.
As a result of the Supreme Court’s decision, the multiplier is calculated from the date of trial and not from the date of death. It has deducted from it a small discount to reflect the risk that the deceased would not have survived to the date of trial. The effect of this change in the law is illustrated in the following simplified example.
A woman aged 54 dies. She would otherwise have had a normal life expectancy. The claim goes to trial 5 years later. The value of the income and services dependency claim is assessed at £10,000 per year until the end of the Deceased’s normal life expectancy.
Using the old method the calculation would be:
Using the new method, the calculation will be:
In Sally Knauer's claim, the difference in approach will increase the damages ordered by about £51,500 taking the total award to about £695,000. More generally, the change in approach will increase awards for future loss of income and services dependency by about 10% depending on the circumstances of the case.
The Judgment has retrospective effect and therefore affects all outstanding Fatal Accident claims. Reserves on all such cases will need review if the risk inherent in this case has not already been allowed for.
For more information, contact Mark Ashley or Simon Perkins.
+44 (0) 117 918 2191
+44 (0) 117 918 2040
David Johnson, David Williams
Rachel Roberts-Jenkins, Stuart Keyden
Ciaran Claffey, Benjamin Newall
Simon Perkins, Jonathan Bonser, Bryony Steele
Mark Ashley, Sara May, Ciaran Claffey
Matthew McGrath, Corinne Slingo, Tracey Longfield
Mark Ashley, Ruth Crackett, Stuart Wallace
Mark Ashley, Stuart Keyden
Khurram Shamsee, Guy Bredenkamp
Simon Perkins, Mark Ashley, Sophie Devlin, Georgia Thear-Graham
Heather Durston-Hillyer, Sean Doherty
Sebastien Kelly, Benjamin Newall
Misty Cawley, Sean Doherty, Philip Boyle
Robyn Reed, Sean Doherty
Max Slinger, Benjamin Newall