A Collection is a selection of features, articles, comments and opinions on any given theme or topic. It allows you to stay up‑to‑date with what interests you most.
Login here to access your saved articles and followed authors.
We have sent you an email so you can reset your password.
Sorry, we had a problem.
Tags related to this article
Published 1 September 2016
On 12 July 2016, the Commission adopted the Privacy Shield as an adequate means of transferring personal data from Europe to the United States. The US Department of Commerce started accepting applications for certification from 1 August 2016. The U.S. Department of Commerce has now also launched a website which provides information on the Privacy Shield which, amongst other things, provides information about complying with, and self-certifying against, the Privacy Shield’s principles.
The Commission's finding of adequacy is based on the following differences between the Privacy Shield and the Safe Harbor scheme:
However, sceptics, when looking at the detail of the certification scheme, would be forgiven for drawing parallels. The following areas are particularly notable:
On 26 July 2016, the Article 29 Working Party issued a statement advising that it "welcomes the improvements brought by the Privacy Shield mechanism compared to the Safe Harbor decision". However, it advises that a number of concerns still remain, particularly around access to personal data by public authorities. The Article 29 Working Party indicated that the first annual joint review will be "a key moment for the robustness and efficiency of the Privacy Shield mechanism to be further assessed". From the perspective of the Article 29 Working Party at least, it seems that the Privacy Shield will be given a (wary) chance for the next 12 months.
As a further note of caution, Max Schrems, the caped crusader of the privacy world, has issued a statement indicating that the Privacy Shield could be subject to similar challenges to those which led to the fall of Safe Harbor.
The European Commission's adequacy decision can be accessed here.
The Article 29 Working Party statement can be accessed here.
The US Department of Commerce website can be accessed here.
The statement issued by Max Schrems can be accessed here.
Shehana Cameron Perera, Lorraine Ekong, Jade Kowalski, Rhiannon Webster, Ceri Fuller, Khurram Shamsee, Christopher Air, Sophie Devlin
Aleksandar Dimitrov, Neal Pal
Rhiannon Webster, Charlie Christie
Hans Allnutt, Mark Anderson, Gregory Bautista, Anjali Das, Kieran Doyle, Bastian Finkel
Hans Allnutt, Rhiannon Webster
Hans Allnutt, Patrick Hill, Laura Stewart, Lorraine Ekong
Lorraine Ekong, Hans Allnutt
Hans Allnutt, Camilla Elliot
Hans Allnutt, Patrick Hill
Hans Allnutt, Rhiannon Webster, Patrick Hill