A Collection is a selection of features, articles, comments and opinions on any given theme or topic. It allows you to stay up‑to‑date with what interests you most.
Login here to access your saved articles and followed authors.
We have sent you an email so you can reset your password.
Sorry, we had a problem.
Tags related to this article
Published 5 February 2015
With constant pressure on budgets and funding, large scale re-organisations and redundancies remain ever present in the news. Since summer 2013, multi-site providers have had to grapple with the decision by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in USDAW v Ethel Austin Ltd (in administration); USDAW and anor etc - the Woolworths case - which sent shockwaves through the legal and HR professions when it decided that the words “at one establishment” are to be disregarded for the purposes of any collective redundancy involving 20 or more employees.
In the Woolworths case, the employer said that collective consultation is triggered when 20 employees are at risk of redundancy in any single establishment operated by it, e.g. a particular store. The employees said that the 20 employee trigger relates to the total number of at risk employees in all of the employer's establishments, i.e. the employer's operation as a whole. The EAT agreed with the employees that the correct test was whether the 20 employee total was triggered by the cumulative total of all the establishments.
This case was appealed to the Court of Appeal in January 2014. However, before making a decision on the substance of the appeal, the Court decided to refer a point to the Court of Justice for the European Union (CJEU) on the interpretation of the European Directive which governs this area.
Today (5 February 2015) we have received the Advocate General's opinion in this case. This is a pre-cursor to the final decision of the CJEU.
Firstly, the Advocate General's opinion is not a legally binding decision, but will be taken into consideration by the CJEU and can be a useful indicator of what the final judgment will be.
The Advocate General has said that the "establishment" is the unit to which employees are assigned, which means that "establishment" does not have to be the whole operation.
It has, however, said that it remains open to Member States to introduce provisions, which are more favourable to employees.
Although this is largely a welcome decision for employers, today's opinion does mean the law relating to collective consultation has not yet been finally determined. Employers still face some uncertainty as to redundancy obligations until there is a final ruling. However many providers have already been adopting the "one establishment" approach post the EAT decision, which, whilst safe, has extended the duration of redundancy exercises, increased salary costs and arguably has caused uncertainty for those affected.
Employers have also had to grapple with the fact that there are often different reasons for redundancies within its operations, e.g. one location may be closing down, whereas another is undergoing a major restructure. Pulling together various different threads of consultation into one exercise has proved troublesome for some employers, as has being in a perpetual state of consultation due to having to aggregate individual redundancies together. Subject to the CJEU's decision, employers may be able to pave a way back to the pre-Woolworths position.
However, in light of this issue, we may see some political will in the run up to the election to address the issue of collective redundancies, particularly if it is considered that the legal obligation to collectively consult has a negative impact on a struggling business, or that the determination of what an "establishment" is causes a disadvantage for some employees in a large scale redundancy exercise.
We have been advising many multi-site employers on this issue for some time. Some top tips are:
Please contact Simon Lambert, Employment and Pensions Group Partner.
Tel: +44(0)117 918 2085
Hannah Chapelhow, Alison Walton
Alison Walton, Hannah Chapelhow, Mary Mundy, Victoria Fletcher
Alison Walton, Hannah Chapelhow, Victoria Fletcher, Mary Mundy
Darryn Hale, Hamza Drabu, Christian Carr
Louise Watson-Jones, Abigail Sneller
Sally Roff, Neil Scott
David Knapp, David Williams
Mary Mundy, Sophie Devlin
Alistair Robertson, Stephen Hocking
Anne Crofts, Alexandra Fosh
Alistair Robertson, Sophie Devlin
Dr Alexandra von Westernhagen