A Collection is a selection of features, articles, comments and opinions on any given theme or topic. It allows you to stay up‑to‑date with what interests you most.
Login here to access your saved articles and followed authors.
We have sent you an email so you can reset your password.
Sorry, we had a problem.
Tags related to this article
Download PDF Print page
Published 27 August 2015
Welcome to the August Edition of DAC Beachcroft's Adjudication Adviser
In the period since ISG v Seevic and Galliford Try v Estura a fair amount of Court time has been spent reviewing the payment mechanisms of various standard forms of contract. This edition of the Adjudication Adviser reports on two further payment cases and how they impact the adjudication regime.
The cases of Leeds v Waco and Caledonian v Mar City provide useful practical guidance to contractors as to when a request for payment can be deemed to be an application for payment. It is certainly the case that some in the industry are attempting to take advantage of ISG v Seevic and Galliford Try v Estura by issuing early and then hoping that a Certificate or payless notice is not issued.
The saying "you wait for ages for a bus and then two come along at once" could not be more apt.
Download to read more.
London - Walbrook
+44 (0)20 7894 6314
By Joanna Grech
By Stephanie Bagshaw, Fiona Gill
By Daniel Kendall
By Andrew Morgan, Joe Whimpenny
By Paul Best
By Andrew Morgan, Mereaira Jones
By Chloe Postlethwaite
By Daniel Kendall, Sarah Pickering
By Stephanie Bagshaw, Matthew Stokes
By Martha Grekos, Isaac Jong
By Adam Simpson
By Iain Witheyman
By Nicola Fairbairn
By Andrew Morgan
By Stephanie Bagshaw, Fiona Gill, Stan Campbell
By Alison Key
By Ben Thornycroft, Dawid Stramski