A Collection is a selection of features, articles, comments and opinions on any given theme or topic. It allows you to stay up‑to‑date with what interests you most.
Login here to access your saved articles and followed authors.
We have sent you an email so you can reset your password.
Sorry, we had a problem.
Tags related to this article
Published 29 May 2014
The Care Act 2014 came onto the statute books on 14 May 2014. It sets out a new framework of local authority duties in relation to the arrangement and funding of social care, along with a number of changes to the regulation of social care providers. It will have a very significant impact on local authorities and the market for social care. The final version of the Act is now available here.
The full implementation timetable is not yet known, but some provisions will come into effect in October 2014. The care costs cap will come into effect in April 2016 and this is likely to be the backstop date for implementation.
Key provisions in the Act include:
The introduction of a new legal framework for a key area of local government responsibility is bound to have a significant impact on authorities, which will be concerned about the demands of implementing a new system. However the Care Act also looks set to place significant substantive demands on authorities as well. There is the prospect of significantly more people qualifying for financial assistance with social care, with the new duties to support carers and a proposed increase in the means test threshold, although much depends on the nature of the new eligibility criteria. The volume of assessments of care needs to be carried out by local authorities will increase significantly, as an assessment of eligibility is the gateway to the care cap system and a number of other rights, so it is no longer of interest only to those who think they might qualify for financial assistance with care.
The Act requires local authorities to manage and develop the market for care in their area. Part of that development may be directly generated by authorities themselves, which will be able to delegate many of their social care functions to organisations from any sector: this could create new market opportunities for providers.
But the shape of the social care market will be significantly changed by the Act in a number of other ways.
The requirement on authorities to promote individual wellbeing when fulfilling their social care functions is intended to alter the commissioning behaviour of local authorities market by restricting their ability to commission 15 minute domiciliary care visits and other minimal provision. Other measures, including the duty of candour, the provisions on safeguarding and the extension of the Human Rights Act to private sector providers, also reflect the new focus on standards of care and sustainability of care providers in light of events such as the Francis Report, the Winterbourne View scandal and the failure of Southern Cross. The wide impact of these measures will be felt across all providers of health and social care services, in the public, private and third sectors, and it remains to be seen how these will affect provider sustainability and cost profiles.
Perhaps the most radical impact on the care market, and on authorities, may come from a new duty on local authorities to arrange care for those with eligible needs even if they will not be receiving any financial support with the costs of that care, along with new transparency about the costs to local authorities of providing social care. The government guidance on this provision confirms that this is intended to allow those individuals to benefit from the lower prices available through local authority frameworks, raising the prospect of an end to the split markets for local authority and self-funded care. As all those involved in negotiating social care contracts will know, this could have a very major impact on local authority commissioning and spending.
Authorities obviously need to understand the nature of the new duties and be aware of their implications both for internal organisation and governance and for commissioning of residential and domiciliary care. Much of the detail of the new framework will be contained in regulations and guidance: it will be very important for authorities to review consultation versions of these documents and contribute to the consultations so that central government has clear information on the practical impact.
It is important to consider how the new duties will link to the work of your Health & Wellbeing Boards and Public Health functions, for example the requirement to provide preventative services and the duties to promote integration and to develop and manage the care market.
Authorities should begin thinking about how they can gather and share information which is relevant to the decisions they need to make about implementation of the Act and ongoing performance of its duties. You need to consider information about services and user profiles which can inform strategic thinking, e.g. by Health & Wellbeing Boards, information from care providers relevant to the new duties to provide information about care costs and information about care service users and potential new service users to inform approaches to commissioning. It will also be important to consider how individuals can be tracked or monitored to enable you to assess the success of particular services or care packages (e.g. to determine the effectiveness of preventative services or signposting to alternative sources of support).
London - Walbrook
+44 (0)20 7894 6020
Thomas Jordan, John Goodman
Hamza Drabu, Charlotte Burnett
Tom Baker, David Williams
Nick Chronias, Udara Ranasinghe
Stephen Hocking, Alistair Robertson