A Collection is a selection of features, articles, comments and opinions on any given theme or topic. It allows you to stay up‑to‑date with what interests you most.
Login here to access your saved articles and followed authors.
We have sent you an email so you can reset your password.
Sorry, we had a problem.
Tags related to this article
Published 23 January 2020
A New Regulator
On 22nd January 2020 the Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick, speaking in the House of Commons announced the creation of a “Building Safety Regulator” to sit within the HSE. Its task will be to raise building safety and performance standards, including overseeing a new, more stringent regime for higher-risk buildings. This will include the design, construction and occupation of high risk buildings to ensure the safety of residents.
The HSE has been tasked with establishing the new regulator in shadow form immediately however, given the acknowledged recruitment issues the HSE currently have, it will be interesting to see how they do this in practical terms. The Government website also suggests that they “will draw on experience and the capabilities of other regulators to implement the new regime”. Dame Judith Hackitt will chair a board to oversee the transition.
There is limited information about the new regulator. The HSE are yet to publish any material or guidance and there will inevitably be a transition phase. The regulator will be backed by criminal sanctions and it will aim to:
The Health and Safety Executive
The HSE have confirmed their priorities for 2020 in their recently published Business Plan.
As well as supporting the government’s fundamental reform of the building safety system the HSE will contribute to government-wide activities on the UK’s departure from the EU, as well as targeting their inspections on specific issues and activities including a sustained focus on work related ill-health.
2019/20 marks the third year of the HSE’s focus on tackling three major causes of work-related ill health – musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), occupational lung disease (OLD) and work-related stress (WRS). In an attempt to reduce the 30.7 million working days lost every year, each of these focus areas has its own priority plan and we anticipate there may be a move towards enforcement after two years of guidance and awareness.
R (on the application of Maughan) v Her Majesty's Senior Coroner for Oxfordshire – In July 2018 the High Court heard the case of Maughan and considered the test for suicide and decided that Coroners/juries have to be satisfied according to the civil standard of proof (more probable than not that the person intended to die). Whereas, the test for unlawful killing remains at the criminal standard. In May 2019 the Court of Appeal agreed. The family have since appealed this decision and the Supreme Court will hear the appeal at the end of February 2020. Changing the burden of proof for unlawful killing to the civil standard may result in more cases being referred to the CPS to consider criminal charges.
Building Works Certificates – One of the largest Approved Inspectors in the UK is being prosecuted for allegedly recklessly issuing a final certificate for building works. The trial is due to conclude in September.
Maritime and Coastguard Agency v Mr David Marr (re-trial) – Mr Marr, the skipper of a commercial trawler, was prosecuted following an incident with an open top fishing boat resulting in the death of three people. A re-trial has been listed as the jury could not come to a verdict. The matter is listed for five days starting 20 July 2020.
Drayton Manor – Following the conclusion of the Inquest into 11 year old Evha Jannath’s death, the HSE have confirmed they will be prosecuting Drayton Manor Theme Park for alleged breaches of Section 3 of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act. The Inquest concluded the death was accidental however the Coroner has written to all theme parks with similar rides to warn them about the issues raised such as inconsistency in the monitoring of CCTV and staff training.
R v Pret A Manger – The company has pleaded not-guilty to one charge of selling food not of the substance demanded, contrary to section 14 of the Food Safety Act 1990. A customer allegedly suffered a severe allergic reaction to sesame in a curried chickpea and mango sandwich on 26 November 2017. This case follows a series of high profile inquests in which food outlets have been embroiled in food labelling issues. A trial has been set for 2nd November 2020.
For more information or advice, please contact one of opur experts in our regulatory team.
London - Walbrook
+44 (0) 20 7894 6230
Clare Hughes-Williams, Catrin Davies, Naomi Park, Sophie Ruffles
Emma Fuller, Jade Batstone, Daniel Miller
Sally Roff, Chris Baranowski
Charlotte Le Maire
Andrés Amunátegui Echeverría, Sascha Stullenberg
Peter Allchorne, David Williams
Richard Highley, Julian Bubb Humfryes
Mark Roach, Rebecca Austin
David Williams, David Johnson
Sara May, Mark Ashley, Liam Riley
Mathew Rutter, James MacNish Porter