Skip to navigation
There are now centrally imposed price caps and there will shortly be maximum wage rates agencies can charge Trusts. If agencies are able to continue to supply staff on this basis, the new pricing constraints are likely to reduce the phenomenal NHS agency staffing bill, which reached £3.3 billion last year, more than the cost of that year's 22 million A&E admissions combined.
The new agency rules are designed both to limit agency expenditure and to ensure that agency staff will be no better off than NHS colleagues, putting an end to unscrupulous agencies charging three times what NHS clinical staff might earn for a normal shift.
However, whilst all Trusts, whether bound by the new rules on agency procurement or otherwise, are under increasing pressure to eliminate agency spend altogether, this is simply not realistic in the short to medium term, and so agency staff will therefore continue to be a vital resource to plug workforce gaps all over the NHS.
Issues often arise when good agency workers (clinical or otherwise) are "poached" by the organisations they are placed with, and so need to make the transition to being a permanent, directly employed staff member.
Where contracts continue to exist outside of the new frameworks, this can certainly be a costly exercise, as many Trusts have found to their detriment. Many NHS Trusts sign up to agencies' own terms & conditions, which can contain onerous charging provisions that leave Trusts exposed to significant and unexpected financial liabilities. Against the background of reduced NHS spend there are an increasing number of agencies not hesitating to litigate with Trusts over transfer fees, placement fees, cancellation fees and the like. For instance, we have seen agencies claim introductory fees relating to placing contractors in different roles to those for which their CVs have been sent; introductory fees when there is a significant question mark over whether the agency even introduced a member of staff; transfer fees arising from supplying temporary workers and cancellation fees for aborted recruitment exercises.
The lack of robust contractual arrangements between Trust and agency will inevitably make these sorts of claims by agencies difficult for Trusts to defend. Being able to push back strongly will be determined by the wording of the contracts and a timely review could save Trusts many thousands of pounds.
A sensible first step in regaining an element of control over relationships with agencies would be to audit the agencies you use, the contracts you have in place with each and whether those are "on or off" the NHS Improvement approved framework. You might find a whole host of contractual arrangements have been entered into over the years and that now is a good time to rationalise those arrangements.
A practical second step is working out who within your organisation is signing up to agreements with agencies. Again, typically, it is likely to be a wide variety of people, some of whom will not have authority to do so. It would be prudent to ring-fence a small group of individuals, making it clear to both the wider organisation and the agencies themselves, that it is this group alone who has authority to contract with them.
Finally, make sure you do not have contracts in place which are skewed in favour of the agencies when it comes to the fees that can be charged. Critically assess what your Trust is, or is not, prepared to sign up to and then ensure this is reflected in your contractual agreements.
For more information please contact Katy Horner on +44(0)117 918 2082 or email email@example.com.
The Public Contracts Regulations 2015 came into force just over a year ago – so what impact have they had and are we seeing huge differences in the way authorities are procuring? The short answer is probably no, but there are some subtle changes that are having an impact.
Click download to view the full alert.
1. the strength of the claimant's tax arguments;2. whether the £11.2m settlement was the result of legal advice;3. the uncertainties and expenses of litigation with the tax authorities; and4. the benefits of settling the claim rather than disputing it.
DAC Beachcroft's Banking & Finance Disputes Journal focuses on events occurring within the banking, financial, city business and general regulatory sectors that give rise to or concern contentious matters, civil or regulatory.
Mr Hunt the Second Claimant is/was an investor in small businesses, particularly those who are looking for cash injection because traditional sources of finance are not available to them. For this he charges high interest, expects early repayment, and often a stake in the business. Sometimes he invests directly, sometimes through companies set up for the purpose. On this occasion he invested through the First Claimant, Swynson Ltd. The target company in question was a US business, Evo, specialising in medical supplies to old peoples' homes looking for a co-investor to fund a management buyout. Mr Hunt, through Swynson Ltd, and based on a due diligence report produced by the defendant firm of accountants Hurst Morrison Thompson ("HMT"), invested circa £15 million in October 2006 and problems emerged very quickly afterwards.
Welcome to DAC Beachcroft's Budget 2014 Alert.
Our analysis as to how today's budget affects the business community is below. We think the three changes which will make the most amount of splash are the helpful relaxation and extension of the ISA rules, the temporary doubling of the annual investment allowance and what according to George Osborne is "the most far-reaching reform to the taxation of pensions since the regime was introduced in 1921".
DAC Beachcroft's Banking & Finance Disputes Journal focuses on events occurring within the banking, financial, city business and general regulatory sectors that give rise to or concern contentious matters, civil or regulatory
After a number of confusing High Court decisions concerning the courts' approach to granting relief from court sanctions, the Court of Appeal has today handed down its decision in Mitchell v News Group Newspapers Ltd and has laid down a clear marker that obtaining relief from sanctions will be hard to achieve. In particular, pressure of work or "well-intentioned incompetence" and/or any other form of human error will almost certainly not suffice.
DAC Beachcroft's Commercial Litigation Digest focuses on events occurring within the banking, financial, city business and general regulatory sectors that give rise to or concern contentious matters, civil or regulatory
DAC Beachcroft's Commercial Litigation Digest focuses on events occurring within the banking, financial, city business and general regulatory sectors that give rise to or concern contentious matters, civil or regulatory.
Select the checkboxes and click 'update' to view different types of resources.