Banking and finance dispute resolution
For the latest news and comment on banking and finance disputes.
For the latest news and comment on banking and finance disputes.
For all the latest news and comment in clinical negligence healthcare law
This collection looks at the latest news and comment on commercial contracting healthcare law. With the health and social care sector under…
For all the latest news and comment in employment and pensions healthcare law
For all the latest legal and regulatory news and comment in health technology
This collection contains DAC B eachcroft's latest report, The Route to Integrated Healthcare , which provides the first practical examples of how…
This collection looks at the latest strategic, commercial, regulatory and negligence legal and advisory news and comment in health and social care. …
For all the latest news and comment on employment and pensions law.
DAC Beachcroft Dublin specialises in insurance, professional indemnity, defendant personal injury, health, commercial litigation and employment work.…
For all the latest new and comment in tax law.
The GC Collective collection offers insight and comment for General Counsels (GCs) and in-house legal teams.
For the latest news and comment on Corporate, M&A and Equity Capital Markets.
Analysis, commentary and checklists on the legal and governance implications of Brexit on businesses operating in, and trading with, the UK
The Accountant's Liability Collection brings you topical news and insight of interest to accountants, actuaries, trustees and other financial…
Events and online training for the health and social care sector.
DAC Beachcroft's LatAm Quarterly Newsletter discusses topical news and issues in Latin America
In response to client suggestions and requests, DAC Beachcroft's insurance sector flagship publication.
For all the latest legal and regulatory news and comment in health and social care integration
For all the latest news and comment in corporate regulatory healthcare law
Find advice, commentary and thought leadership on all aspects of Director's & Officer's Insurance; from contract formation through to complex…
This collection looks at the latest news, comment and development on the law affecting mental health services. The law affecting mental health…
Our market-leading Information Law team regularly publish articles and updates addressing the ever-evolving Information Law landscape.
This collection looks at our Safety, Health and Environment Team and the products and services they can provide. In the climate of increased…
The Insurance Act 2015 comes into force in August 2016 and will represent a significant change to insurance contract law in this country. This…
Legislative changes are bringing major changes to the Insurance landscape. This collection houses DAC Beachcroft's alerts on the pertinent issues.
For all the latest news and comment in clinical regulatory healthcare law
Organisations face ever-increasing expectations from Government, regulators, customers or service users, and other stakeholders, so scrutiny and…
For all the latest legal and regulatory news and comment in healthcare estates and facilities management
This collection addresses the full spectrum of cyber security and data risk management – the zeitgeist of our age.
We have acted for clients in the majority of significant product liability cases that have been decided in the UK over the last 35 years. Our product…
Considering the future landscapes of our cities
The European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into force on 25 May 2016. A rewrite of European data protection law, the GDPR imposes…
Considering the future of housing
For the latest news and comment on public procurement law.
Welcome to the Construction Risks collection. This space is used to report upon issues of interest to those who seek to allocate, manage and reduce…
Technology, brands and intellectual capital are key assets for any successful business. Our intellectual property (IP) team are experts at helping…
Considering the future of retail
The Insurance Market Conditions and Trends report is DAC Beachcroft's insurance sector flagship publication. Now in its tenth year, the report…
The Solicitors' Risk Collection addresses issues and developments affecting legal practitioners, and the professional indemnity insurers of legal…
Published On: 17 May 2016
Recently, the Dutch Data Protection Authority ("Dutch DPA") published new policy rules on camera surveillance ("Policy Rules"). Businesses and public authorities are ever more often using camera surveillance to provide security of persons and goods. This often entails the processing of personal data, as a result of which the Netherlands Personal Data Protection Act (Wet bescherming persoonsgegevens ("PDPA") applies. The use of camera surveillance is becoming more and more advanced. This is the reason why the Dutch DPA thinks that it is a good moment to publish its new Policy Rules on camera surveillance. These Policy Rules replace policy rules issued in 2004 on the use of cameras in public spaces and these policy rules are therefore more elaborate. The release of the new Policy Rules also provides a good opportunity to revisit what a (private) organisation has to take into account when using camera surveillance.
Rules for Camera Surveillance
The following general starting points are important.
Obligation to report
In principle, the use of camera surveillance must be reported to the Dutch DPA. Such a report must be made before starting the processing. If certain requirements (mentioned in Article 38 of the Exemption Decree (Vrijstellingsbesluit)) have been met this processing does not have to be reported: inter alia, the camera surveillance is set up to secure persons and goods which have been entrusted to the care of the controller, the camera surveillance is clearly visible and the personal data are deleted no later than four weeks after the video footage has been made. Covert camera surveillance must always be reported to the Dutch DPA.
Recent Case Law
In recent case law an employer was rapped on the knuckles for not complying with the rules and regulations on camera surveillance.
The employer had previously faced difficulties with three of its employees not following instructions. Separate to this, the employer had placed a number of hidden cameras. The employees were not aware of this and found the cameras whilst tidying and cleaning the workplace. As a result, they sent an angry but neat letter on behalf of a considerable number of employees in which they expressed their worries on and objections against the camera surveillance. The three employees concerned in these judgments had also put their names on the letter.
For the employer enough was enough and he requested the Subdistrict Court to terminate the employment agreements with those three employees. The Subdistrict Court terminated the employment agreements but also considered in detail the circumstances around the employer's use of the camera surveillance. The Subdistrict Court found that the rules around use of camera surveillance had not been met at all. For instance, the camera surveillance had not been disclosed, the works council had not been asked to consent, and the camera surveillance had not been reported to the Dutch DPA.
Therefore, the acts of the employer were regarded as seriously culpable As a result, the employees did not only get the ‘standard’ statutory transition fee, but on top of that a fair compensation was granted. The employer had to pay two employees an extra compensation of EUR 15,000, and to the other employee – who had been in the employment for a longer time – the employer had to pay EUR 48,000 (approximately two annual salaries).
Organisations should ensure that any use they make of camera surveillance in the Netherlands is in compliance with the new Policy Rules.
A press release on the Policy Rules can be accessed here (Dutch).
The Policy rules can be accessed here (Dutch).
Submitted by Nicole Wolters Ruckert and Leonie van Sloten of Kennedy Van der Laan – Amsterdam, The Netherlands