Banking and finance dispute resolution
For the latest news and comment on banking and finance disputes.
For the latest news and comment on banking and finance disputes.
For all the latest news and comment in clinical negligence healthcare law
This collection looks at the latest news and comment on commercial contracting healthcare law. With the health and social care sector under…
For all the latest news and comment in employment and pensions healthcare law
For all the latest legal and regulatory news and comment in health technology
This collection contains DAC B eachcroft's latest report, The Route to Integrated Healthcare , which provides the first practical examples of how…
This collection looks at the latest strategic, commercial, regulatory and negligence legal and advisory news and comment in health and social care. …
For all the latest news and comment on employment and pensions law.
DAC Beachcroft Dublin specialises in insurance, professional indemnity, defendant personal injury, health, commercial litigation and employment work.…
For all the latest new and comment in tax law.
The GC Collective collection offers insight and comment for General Counsels (GCs) and in-house legal teams.
For the latest news and comment on Corporate, M&A and Equity Capital Markets.
Analysis, commentary and checklists on the legal and governance implications of Brexit on businesses operating in, and trading with, the UK
The Accountant's Liability Collection brings you topical news and insight of interest to accountants, actuaries, trustees and other financial…
Events and online training for the health and social care sector.
DAC Beachcroft's LatAm Quarterly Newsletter discusses topical news and issues in Latin America
In response to client suggestions and requests, DAC Beachcroft's insurance sector flagship publication.
For all the latest legal and regulatory news and comment in health and social care integration
For all the latest news and comment in corporate regulatory healthcare law
Find advice, commentary and thought leadership on all aspects of Director's & Officer's Insurance; from contract formation through to complex…
This collection looks at the latest news, comment and development on the law affecting mental health services. The law affecting mental health…
Our market-leading Information Law team regularly publish articles and updates addressing the ever-evolving Information Law landscape.
This collection looks at our Safety, Health and Environment Team and the products and services they can provide. In the climate of increased…
The Insurance Act 2015 comes into force in August 2016 and will represent a significant change to insurance contract law in this country. This…
Legislative changes are bringing major changes to the Insurance landscape. This collection houses DAC Beachcroft's alerts on the pertinent issues.
For all the latest news and comment in clinical regulatory healthcare law
Organisations face ever-increasing expectations from Government, regulators, customers or service users, and other stakeholders, so scrutiny and…
For all the latest legal and regulatory news and comment in healthcare estates and facilities management
This collection addresses the full spectrum of cyber security and data risk management – the zeitgeist of our age.
We have acted for clients in the majority of significant product liability cases that have been decided in the UK over the last 35 years. Our product…
Considering the future landscapes of our cities
The European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into force on 25 May 2016. A rewrite of European data protection law, the GDPR imposes…
Considering the future of housing
For the latest news and comment on public procurement law.
Welcome to the Construction Risks collection. This space is used to report upon issues of interest to those who seek to allocate, manage and reduce…
Technology, brands and intellectual capital are key assets for any successful business. Our intellectual property (IP) team are experts at helping…
Considering the future of retail
The Insurance Market Conditions and Trends report is DAC Beachcroft's insurance sector flagship publication. Now in its tenth year, the report…
The Solicitors' Risk Collection addresses issues and developments affecting legal practitioners, and the professional indemnity insurers of legal…
Published On: 3 December 2015
Often seen as controversial by the press but essential by restructuring professionals, pre-packs are the arrangement whereby a sale of all or part of a company's business or assets is negotiated with a purchaser prior to the appointment of an administrator and the sale is effected immediately on appointment. Pre-packs can be an effective means of rescuing businesses and preserving jobs, yet the practice has been controversial due to concerns about the sale of businesses to connected persons, the lack of transparency and the possible prejudice to unsecured creditors who learn about the sale after the event.
In response to these concerns, Statement of Insolvency Practice 16 (SIP 16) was introduced in January 2009 (revised in November 2013) to create greater transparency over the pre-pack process by requiring administrators to disclose information to creditors as soon as possible after completion of a pre-pack sale.
In July 2013, the government went further and appointed Teresa Graham, a senior accountant, to oversee an independent review to assess the long-term impact of pre-pack deals on the economy, whether they are beneficial to creditors, and the usefulness of the procedure when rescuing businesses. Her report 'Graham Review into Pre-Pack Administration' was published in July 2014. The report identified that 2365 businesses in the UK entered administration in 2013 and that approximately 600 resulted in a pre-pack sale. It concluded that pre-pack sales bring benefits to the insolvency framework, that reform of the process is worthwhile, but there should be some major improvements to how they are administered, particularly where pre-packs involve connected parties.
The Graham Report recommended the creation of a Pre-Pack Pool to review pre-pack deals before they go ahead; the creation of a "viability review" to reduce the likelihood that unviable businesses will not be allowed back into the market only to fail again; and improved marketing of the pre-pack sale where possible. Better and more stringent guidance on the pre-pack process were recommended to follow in a revised SIP 16.
The revised SIP 16 applies to appointments made on or after 1 November 2015. Its aim is to introduce increased transparency and, in turn, increased confidence in the pre-pack process.
The Pre-Pack Pool application process opened on 2 November 2015. The Pool is an independent body of experienced business people (but with no practising insolvency practitioners) who, having reviewed the application and supporting documentation, will offer their opinion on the reasonableness of the proposed pre-packaged sale of a business and/or its assets by connected parties to a company. Its function is performed by Pre Pack Pool Limited and its operation monitored by a number of interested professional bodies (known as the Oversight Group) through a service agreement.
The application for an opinion is submitted through a website and once completed is allocated to one of the 19 members of the Pre-Pack Pool. A fee of £800 plus VAT is payable and the stated aim is that a response will be given within 2 business days. The Pool member can issue one of three opinions:
The Pool member will not issue reasons for its decision, the justification being that this would cause delay and increase costs. There is no appeal from the decision and no correspondence will be entered into.
The process is currently voluntary and it will be interesting to see how many applications are made. Anecdotal evidence suggests that as at 10 November 2015 there had been one application, the outcome of which is unknown.
At present, an administrator can chose to accept an offer from a connected party and proceed with a pre-pack sale even if the Pre-Pack Pool decides there is a lack of evidence to support a pre-pack sale, but the administrator will have to give a clear explanation as to why the sale took place in the SIP 16 statement. There is no ostensible sanction for ignoring the opinion of the Pre-Pack Pool but it is possible that an administrator who serially ignores the opinion of the Pre-Pack Pool, or whose pre-pack purchasers don't seek an opinion, may face closer conduct scrutiny than might otherwise be the case.
The ability to pre-package a business sale is an essential mechanism for administrators to achieve best value for creditors and to secure continued employment for some, or all, of the workforce and it is hoped that by implementing the Graham Review some of the more controversial aspects of old-style pre-packs will fall away.
There is likely to be ongoing debate about the operation of the Pre-Pack Pool in practice. Whilst the 48 hour turnaround period for an application is acceptable, there are issues such as whether purchasers will require professional assistance when completing the application; whether the pool members will have sufficient expertise and experience to understand complex transactions; whether complex matters can be decided within 48 hours in practice; and whether the application fee and professional costs will deter applications to the Pool. Ultimately, if the Pre-Pack Pool is underutilised, or its opinion frequently ignored, then might its fitness for purposes be called into question?
The Government has reserved some powers in the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 ("SBEEA") to prohibit or restrict pre-pack sales. It is hoped that such prohibitions and restrictions will not become necessary if administrators embrace the guidance in the newly released SIP 16 and the Pre-Pack Pool procedure is properly used on a voluntary basis.